Essay Film Analysis Of Platoon Definition

A Critical Analysis Of The Film Platoon

The Vietnam War was on everyone's mind in 1960s and 1970s in our country. It was the center of much of America's troubles during this time, but only the soldier's who fought in that war knew the true madness that was Vietnam. Oliver Stone began writing Platoon because the Vietnam War was "a pocket of our history nobody understands." (Schuer t24) Platoon is a movie which should be viewed by everyone, not only for its cinematic qualities but for its historic insight as well.

Platoon is an Orion Pictures production, filmed in 1986. Written and directed by Oliver Stone it tells the gruesome story of a Vietnam War not known by the American public. Tom Beringer, who plays the experienced Sergeant Barnes, was nominated in the Best Supporting Actor category along with Willem Defoe who plays Sergeant Elias. Charlie Sheen plays Chris Taylor, an idealistic student who had dropped out of college, joined the army, and volunteered for Vietnam. His idealism and view of war in general rapidly change during the course of the film. The character is based off the director Oliver Stone, who dropped out of Yale to join the war effort. Chris and the rest of the soldiers are unaware of what they are getting into and are given little time to prepare. "Trapped in the cage of front-line life, living (if they're luck) from moment to moment, values that apply elsewhere fade out for Barnes and others" (Kauffman 24). While serving his time Taylor experience the war in its full spectrum, from the homesickness and the comradery of the men to the nightmares of battle.

The enemy is the North Vietnamese and the Viet Cong but you rarely view them except as shadowy figures in the jungle or momentarily illuminated by the light of a flare. There are no defined battle lines and the combat scenes lead you to believe that the enemy is everywhere. The line between good and evil is blurred or nonexistent in this film. Sergeant Elias is portrayed as a caring, intelligent leader who escapes reality through the use of drugs. His nemesis, Sergeant Barnes, is portrayed as an efficient fighting machine who will stop at nothing to get the job done. You soon realize that he, too, is just doing everything to ensure his own survival.

Platoon shows how the War affected the soldiers, and how none of them felt that they were fighting for a reason. The film shows the Vietnam experience from the average soldier's point of view. In the beginning Chris Taylor is very ignorant and his chances of survival are slim. The movie went beyond just showing battles, with the showing of the moral dilemmas that the soldiers faced. The film does...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Film Review: Platoon, "Fighting for a Different Cause"

904 words - 4 pages "I can't believe we're fighting each other when we should be fighting them." This is a thought from Chris, the main character of the film Platoon. It refers to men who were supposed to be fighting the Vietcong, but instead are fighting their fellow soldiers. The world is made up of people with differing views on everything, including how to treat others. Some people can be fighting for the same cause with different takes on it. In war, the men...

A critical analysis of the play, "Ernest"

1065 words - 4 pages English Written Task 4* Algernon's commentary on the idle rich.Algernon talks about the "lower" classes and their responsibility or duty to society. In Algernon's following statement, Oscar Wilde has cleverly set the character up to portray the self-righteousness of the Upper Class (to the audience) at the same time as...

A Film Analysis of Leon: The Professional

1702 words - 7 pages This is a movie about a professional killer, or "Cleaner", named Léon played by Jean Reno, and his unlikely interaction with a 12-year old girl, Mathilda played by Natalie Portman. Mathilda's family is murdered by corrupt Drug Enforcement Agents (DEA) lead by Agent Stansfield played by Gary Oldman. Agent Stansfield, is portrayed as a drug addict, mentally unstable and an overtly violent and corrupt law enforcement team leader. This movie...

A Critical Analysis Of: The Red Badge Of Courage

1798 words - 7 pages Stephen Crane had a very short writing career, only about 10 years, and in that short time, he greatly influenced the world of writing. His first work to gain worldwide recognition was

A Critical Analysis Of "the Parting" By Michael Drayton

801 words - 3 pages A Critical Analysis of "The Parting" by Michael Drayton By looking at a poem which has a specific form, for example the sonnet, consider to what extent its particular techniques enhance its meaning.      The parting by Michael Drayton is a sonnet. It is a poem about the break up of the relationship between the author and his partner. I feel that the meaning of the poem is greatly enhanced by its form, and for...

A Critical Analysis of the National Numeracy Strategy

2394 words - 10 pages A Critical Analysis of the National Numeracy Strategy. The National Numeracy Strategy was implemented in September 1999, setting a target for 75% of all pupils reaching at least level four in mathematics by 2002. This essay will focus on the findings since the implementation of the strategy for both pupils and teachers. In order to do this I will examine the Numeracy Strategy Framework guidelines, which state how the teaching of mathematics...

Analysis of the Opening of a Thriller Film

4216 words - 17 pages Analysis of the Opening of a Thriller Film The brief we were given last year for AS was to produce the opening of a thriller film. The sequence had to include titles and last between two to three minutes. The style of the film and newspapers are very different, as will be shown in the research. Last year we filmed and edited but this year I will work mainly with texts and prototypes of my layouts and making changes...

A Critical Analysis of Fostering Diversity in the Classroom

673 words - 3 pages Fostering diversity in the class roomDiversity comes in many forms and provides a great deal of benefit to the classroom. It is beneficial to all students, public school through post secondary. These benefits are then transferred to the workplace when the student leaves the academic world and enters the labor market. San Diego...

Critical Analysis of “The Awakening”

1231 words - 5 pages Critical Analysis of "The Awakening" PAGE \* Arabic 1 Critical Analysis of "The Awakening"Mariusz PerkowskiUniversity of PhoenixCritical Analysis of "The Awakening"The Awakening by Kate Chopin demonstrates life dilemmas of women during the late nineteenth century. Period of time in the history that has many similarities to the position of women is society these days. While in our culture we have...

Critical Analysis of "The Veldt"

1652 words - 7 pages “The Veldt” by Ray Bradbury deals with some of the same fundamental problems that we are now encountering in this modern day and age, such as the breakdown of family relationships due to technology. Ray Bradbury is an American writer who lived from 1920 to 2012 (Paradowski). Written in 1950, “The Veldt” is even more relevant to today than it was then. The fundamental issue, as Marcelene Cox said, “Parents are often so busy with the physical...

A short analysis of the 1950's film, Sunset Boulevard

598 words - 2 pages "Sunset Boulevard" is a self referential film that critiques

Thank you for signing up. For more from The Nation, check out our latest issue.

Everett CollectionCharlie Sheen in Platoon, 1986.

Ad Policy

Oliver Stone’s answer to probably every John Wayne war film ever made.

Oliver Stone’s Platoon, about a group of American infantrymen in Vietnam between 1967 and 1968, is the first Hollywood film about this country’s Southeast Asian adventure that’s just a war movie—and, weirdly, its straightforward genre-picture intensity makes all the other film treatments of the subject look evasive and superficial. Even leaving aside the recently popular P.O.W.-rescue movies with Sylvester Stallone and Chuck Norris, which are simply macho pulp in exotic settings, Milton Caniff on steroids, American movies haven’t done very well by the horrors of Vietnam and Cambodia. All the serious films about Southeast Asia of the past ten years have been so intent on “coming to terms” with the experience that they’ve barely bothered to represent it. For all the virtues of Apocalypse Now, no one could possibly have learned anything about Vietnam from it. Coppola staged the war as a psychedelic opera—jungles bursting into flames with the Doors’ sinister “The End” on the soundtrack, copters swooping out of the sky to the music of “Ride of the Valkyries”—and the grandiose style robbed the subject of its specificity. Coppola was so caught up in creating his huge metaphoric vision of chaos (derived, in just about equal parts, from Heart of Darkness and Michael Herr’s Dispatches) that he seemed not to notice the inanity of the movie’s subtext: that the war could have been won if our military leaders weren’t so inept and our soldiers so stoned, if only we Americans weren’t so stupid and spiritually empty.

Michael Cimino’s Oscar-winner, The Deer Hunter, also featured a hallucinated Vietnam: the war was a bad dream that his heroes, a bunch of regular-guy Pennsylvania factory workers, couldn’t wake up from. Cimino meant to contrast the supposed purity of traditional American values with the war’s hellish suspension of moral categories, and he wasn’t fussy about how he defined his terms—not only idealizing the “clean” sportsmanship of the heroes’ deer-hunting expeditions, but also inventing a Russian-roulette torture by the group’s Vietnamese captors. The Deer Hunter was as overblown as Apocalypse Now, but in a different register, like an opera scored by Springsteen. It had a heavy, plodding spirit, a populist ethos verging (probably without meaning to) on the demagogic, and a defeated air that somehow managed to congratulate us on our wounded innocence, our stunned simplicity. Neither of those big-deal movies was about Vietnam at all—they were about the shape the war took in our imaginations (which is, perhaps, why they were both so muddled and unresolved). But the war was, of course, more than a bad trip, as Coppola would have it, or a child’s nightmare, as in Cimino. Platoon gives Vietnam back some of its reality.

In Platoon, the war is so real that it actually sobers up Oliver Stone, who, as a screenwriter (Midnight Express, Scarface, Eight Million Ways to Die, Year of the Dragon), has developed his own brand of hysterical machismo. The contemporary action pictures he’s written may have started out as explorations of aspects of the underworld and the drug culture, but they all wound up as lurid, wired celebrations of chaos and obscenity: uneasy mixtures of tabloid moralizing and gonzo relish, stuffed into conventional genre structures that served to emphasize the filmmakers’ bad faith. Salvador, released early last year (and now available on videocassette), was written and directed by Stone, and made a little more sense. Its hero, a Hunter Thompson-like freelance journalist played by James Woods (with even more than his usual ferrety intensity), was clearly a kind of war junkie, traveling to Central America in search of a revolution to get high on: the character seemed an acknowledgment of Stone’s own guilty pleasure in out-of-control violence and reckless, “existential” tests of manhood. Although Salvador‘s politics got a bit confused and both the action and the performances were sometimes pointlessly frenetic, the movie managed, in its self-conscious way, to convey the desperate atmosphere of crisis—and without turning its background of Third World turmoil into spectacle (as Roland Joffe’s The Killing Fields often did with its powerful and beautiful images of the Khmer Rouge takeover of Cambodia). Salvador was a wild, unstable movie that, intermittently, was also a vivid essay on varieties of instability, personal and political.

Stone’s Vietnam movie is, surprisingly, the cleanest, simplest work he has ever done. He’s not exactly an austere director, even here, but he keeps the movie focused on the day-to-day experience of his platoon through a sequence of five military actions along the Cambodian border, and he has the sense to realize that the young soldiers’ fear is all the subject he needs. Stone treats the war and its participants with a strange kind of reverence, as if here, at the source of his obsession with violence and madness, he doesn’t need to add anything, to jack up the voltage. In some way, the failure of earlier Vietnam movies has probably helped him. We’ve had the war as metaphor for moral chaos, and the war as rock-and-roll hallucination. Stone, who served in Vietnam in the late 1960s, must have looked at those films and asked himself if the war he’d fought was horrible because our leaders were dithering incompetents or because our soldiers were too far gone on pot or acid or Hendrix to know what was happening to them. In Stone’s version, it’s the soldiers who know exactly what they’re doing, who kill most efficiently, like his appalling Sergeant Barnes (played by Tom Berenger, whose facial makeup transcends all previous definitions of “battle-scarred”), that are the most dangerous; and it’s only the “heads”—the guys who smoke pot and listen to rock—who retain some vestige of decency and rationality. He seems to have decided that the war was awful because it was wrong to begin with, and because people were dying all around him.

This blunt attitude gives Stone’s writing and direction a kind of ferocious concentration they’ve never had before. The fact that he’s drawing on his own experience obviously helps, too. He’s not scattering wild notions and off-the-wall verbal exchanges all over the landscape, as he usually does: in Platoon, he’s too busy filling in remembered details. He adopts the classic perspective of a young soldier (Charlie Sheen) seeing action for the first time, and everything is seen here with the heightened alertness of terror: the agony of night watches; the lightning-fast mayhem of a fire fight; even the smaller, peripheral dangers—snakes, insects—that help turn simple fear into panic. It’s The Red Badge of Courage, without the courage. “Ain’t no such thing as a coward out here,” one weary veteran tells the young soldier before the climactic engagement: there are isolated acts of genuine heroism, but the only real prize this war has to offer is the sight of the helicopter that lifts you away from it for good. Platoon is even more narrowly focused than World War II movies were—there is (blessedly) little talk among the grunts about the girls they left behind or the candy store they’re going to open up when they get back home or how the Yankees are doing—and the limitation is appropriate and powerful. The platoon Stone has created (or re-created) is a world of its own, where the business of survival drives everything else—even notions of home—from consciousness.

Stone’s directorial style, which is fast, kinetic and rather literal, serves him well in the action scenes: there are few battle sequences on film as tense and frightening as these. In the intervals between skirmishes, his writing takes over, and though it’s not as florid as usual, it still causes some problems. The conflict between Sergeant Barnes and his “head” counterpart, the smart, brave Sergeant Elias (Willem Dafoe), is crudely drawn and, worse yet, symbolic: the young hero, narrating in voice-over, refers to Barnes as “our Captain Ahab,” and, after all the shooting is over, speaks of “Barnes and Elias fighting for possession of my soul.” That dramatic hyperbole is meant to illustrate the not very original thesis that Stone saves until the last few seconds of the movie: “The enemy,” Sheen’s voice intones, “was in us.” There is, of course, some truth in that, but there’s some truth in almost anything we can say about that complex war—and what’s refreshing about Platoon up to that point is that it has mostly resisted the impulse to generalize, to make the kind of statement that, like Coppola’s and Cimino’s, can’t possibly tell us any more than a fraction of the truth. At its best, Platoon simply shows us as much as we need to know about a small patch of the territory—Stone’s own experience in Vietnam—which is probably more valuable.

It’s a little ironic, though, that after his manic, hallucinated versions of other people’s lives—the feverishly caricatured Turks Chinese-Americans and Miami Cubans of his previous scripts—Oliver Stone has become an honorable and scrupulous artist in dealing with the central experience of his own life. Let’s hope that this strong movie isn’t just an isolated episode in Stone’s career, that he’ll be able to carry over his new rigor and generosity from his memory to his imagination. Vietnam seems to have made him a better filmmaker—his next movies should tell us whether, in the best war-movie tradition, it’s also made a man out of him.

0 thoughts on “Essay Film Analysis Of Platoon Definition

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *